Thursday, September 29, 2011

At the Table

I heard the most interesting application of Exodus 25:23-30 today on 'Homekeepers with Arthelene Rippy' (1pm, CTN Ch 22, Tampa/Clearwater, FL).  

The lady Arthelene was interviewing has written a book on the Table God told Moses to build ... with purpose for all the details ... and comment on the fact that the height of the table is almost exactly what we generally use today for our dining room tables among many others. But toward the end of today's interview, the lady said something about offenses at the dinner table leaving scars on children that result in their own use of a dinner table when they are grown, and have the opportunity to share the Bread of Presence with their own families.

When I heard her say that, the image of having my dinner plate, silverware and glass of milk placed inside a box set on its side at my place at the table (to keep me from looking around and not eating [at the desired speed?]), literally JUMPED into my mind. and I realized... although my husband and I often do eat at the same time (and even sometimes have the same meal - I know, how shocking!) it is very seldom that we eat at the same table... much less at the 'dining room table'... usually special occasions, when we have guests... and it got me wondering about any connection between the two.

Guess I'll have to try and catch their conversation again tomorrow to see where it leads. 

P.S. Ah, well... I'll just have to ponder the concept, as I got no new input; the program subject was different the following day.

Monday, September 19, 2011

What's Your Personality?

And this is where one aspect of my morning query arose.  The query regarding personality.


What is personality anyway?  Is it other than the results of a collection of choices made in our formative years in response to the stimuli around us, merged with basic natural responses and instincts, and a small amount of DNA/RNA differences from person to person?


As a child in our world ...nation, state, county, village, and finally home and family... learns what ways work and don't work to get their needs met - for love, security, sustenance mostly - they make these choices - trial and error, trial and seeming success -  and as the child learns from these, little by little the child will settle upon a strategy for living which appears to work for him/her.  It will become the way they see themselves.  ... their, "This is how I function - how I interact with others" (be they elders, peers or their junior counterparts) - this becomes "who they are" - their personality.


BUT - if all this was built on a belief of god-less-ness AND THEN their heart embraces salvation through the finished work of Christ Jesus, will that ground work, those choices and decisions made before, not HAVE to be revisited in light of the new frame of reference?


Now, I realize this falls under the heading of renewing of our minds, but what I'm seeing in and around me, is people who are - yes, they really are Believers in Jesus Christ, and they faithfully read His Word, sing praise and worship songs (even hymns!) , many are Spirit-filled Believers - but if they are asked specifically about themselves, autopilot kicks in and they're describing the personality that was their "old man"! 


That representation of ourselves that was crucified with Christ should not be who we see ourselves as being! And we must get out of the habit of speaking of ourselves in those old, outdated terms.  That person died with Christ and was raised up a new creation - not a reworked version of the old one.


Look at Paul - he even went so far as to change his name to keep himself from the possibility of seeing his old self as his new self.  Sure, he still remembered what he had done, how he had behaved and even how to make tents, but I really believe his change of name was a deliberate move to separate the new creation from the old, dead works life.


It seems we resist allowing God to alter what we see as our "self" ... to alter our "who I am" ... to alter our personalities.  Was the "who-we-were" working that well for us that it couldn't do with the change?